TL;DR (elementary worldly wisdom): If your business feels “fine,” that’s often when you should worry. Stagnation usually isn’t bad luck. It’s a predictable pile-up of human folly: protecting the old game too long, underinvesting until you’re desperate, worshipping a plan that’s already obsolete, tolerating misalignment, clinging to the wrong people in the wrong seats (including yourself), starving the future, and refusing to update your beliefs. Use inversion: study what causes stagnation, then systematically avoid it.
The Decision Point Every Mid-Market Leader Faces
Let’s keep this simple and honest. You’ve built a business. People rely on it. You sign the checks. You carry the worry. And at a certain point you look around and realize: nothing is “wrong,” but nothing is really getting better either.
That “fine” feeling can be very expensive.
So instead of asking, “How do I grow?” try inversion. It’s a better tool than optimism.
Ask: “How do I guarantee stagnation?”
Then don’t do those things.
Most stagnation is self-inflicted. Not because owners are stupid. Because owners are human. And humans are wired to protect comfort, avoid embarrassment, and postpone pain. That wiring is useful if you’re trying to survive. It’s terrible if you’re trying to build something that lasts.
Here’s a workable list of the common ways to kill momentum—told plainly, with no incense burning.
First: deny reality while calling it loyalty. You keep the old model because it worked once and you feel attached to it. It’s familiar. It made you money. It made you proud. And changing it feels like admitting you were wrong.
You weren’t wrong. You’re just late.
Kodak is the famous case. They built the digital camera and still protected film. That’s not a lack of intelligence. That’s incentives, denial, and fear. Fujifilm did the opposite. They accepted the unpleasant truth and rebuilt the business into something broader—healthcare, materials, imaging.
If you want to avoid stagnation, don’t wait for humiliation. Make a habit of asking: “What is getting weaker that we’re pretending is fine?” If you can’t name it, you’re not paying attention. If you can name it and do nothing, you’re bargaining.
A practical habit: once a quarter, write down three things: what’s working, what’s fading, what must change. Then do one thing from the “must change” column. One. Not fifteen. Just one that actually ships.

Second: starve the business of capability, then act surprised when growth is painful. This is the classic mistake. You treat systems, talent, and training like luxuries. You wait for “extra cash” to invest. Extra cash rarely shows up on schedule. Pressure shows up. Then you buy what you should’ve built earlier, but you buy it in a panic, at a premium, with everyone already exhausted.
This is like refusing to maintain the brakes because the car is still moving.
Avoiding stagnation means accepting a boring truth: you have to invest before you feel ready. Not because it’s exciting. Because it’s sane.
A practical habit: reserve a fixed portion of your resources for future capacity—tools, training, process, talent. Treat it as a cost of staying in the game, not a reward for winning it.
Third: worship the annual plan. People love plans because they reduce anxiety. They also create a special kind of stupidity: commitment to a story that stopped being true.
Markets change. Customers change. Costs change. Technology changes. Your plan sits there looking confident while reality walks past it.
Netflix adapted. Blockbuster didn’t. That’s the whole story. Blockbuster had plans and assets. Netflix had the willingness to change its mind and cannibalize itself.
So don’t fall in love with a calendar. Fall in love with feedback.
A practical habit: shorten the loop. Work in quarters. Pick a few outcomes. Re-check assumptions. If something important changes, update the plan like an adult instead of defending it like a politician.

Fourth: let misalignment rot. This is where owners lose years.
People say they want growth. Then they resist every change required to earn it. Systems that worked at one size start to fail quietly at the next size. Partners that fit yesterday’s model start pulling against tomorrow’s direction.
If you want stagnation, here’s a great method: upgrade the CRM and ignore behavior. Hire strong people and keep weak processes. Announce a new strategy and keep incentives tied to the old one. You’ll get theater instead of progress.
Avoiding stagnation is not inspirational. It’s mechanical. Align incentives, roles, systems, and partners with where you’re going—not where you’ve been.
Fifth: protect the wrong people in the wrong seats because it feels “nice.” This is where business becomes emotional, and most owners try to pretend it isn’t.
Your business will not outgrow its leadership. That includes you. If you are the bottleneck and you refuse to change, the company will politely stop growing around you. It won’t announce it. It’ll just slow down.
Sometimes the founder can scale. Sometimes the founder needs to change how they operate. Sometimes you need different leaders in key seats. This is not moral judgment. It’s matching talent to the job.
Apple is the famous case people argue about forever. Jobs was pushed out in 1985. When he returned in 1997, he led with a different posture and built an ecosystem and team that could execute. The point isn’t the drama. The point is that leadership fit matters, and refusing to face it is very costly.
Sixth: optimize the present until you’ve eliminated the future. If you want stagnation, cut every “non-essential” investment—innovation, exploration, new products, adjacent markets—because the core is busy and you want nice-looking short-term numbers.
That produces a clean spreadsheet and a dead company.
Amazon didn’t stay a bookstore. They expanded—electronics, cloud, grocery, entertainment—because they understood optionality and long-term compounding. Expansion isn’t always wise, but starving the future is almost always unwise.
If you want to avoid stagnation, keep a deliberate slice of attention and resources aimed at what’s next. Protect it from the tyranny of the urgent.
Seventh: refuse to update beliefs. Pride is a killer. People say they want “consistency,” but what they really mean is they don’t want to admit they were wrong.
Continuous reassessment is not chaos. It’s discipline: watching what’s true, comparing it to what you assumed, and adjusting.
Microsoft missed major shifts for a period, then later leaned hard into cloud under Satya Nadella and changed the trajectory. That’s what updating beliefs looks like at scale.
A practical habit: once a month, ask three questions:
- What did we assume that might not be true anymore?
- What are customers telling us with their behavior (not their words)?
- What are we stubbornly defending?

Now, if you want the blunt summary—the Munger-ish version—it’s this:
- Stagnation comes from denial, then underinvestment, then misalignment, then pride.
- Growth comes from clear thinking, early investment, alignment, and the humility to change your mind.
None of this is fun. It’s not supposed to be. If building a durable business were easy, everyone would do it and nobody would pay you for it.
So the question isn’t, “Do you have a strategy?” Most people can print one.
The question is: are you systematically avoiding the standard ways humans mess this up? Because if you’re not, the default outcome is “fine”…until it isn’t.
Sources
- Harvard Business Review – "Breaking Out of Stagnation" – https://hbr.org/2019/01/breaking-out-of-stagnation
- Forbes Business Council – "Why Some Businesses Grow While Others Stagnate" – https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/
- McKinsey & Company – "Strategic Planning in an Uncertain World" – https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance
- Inc.com – "Leadership and Business Growth Research" – https://www.inc.com/leadership











Recent Comments